Skip to main content

INDIA DELIBERATELY FIRED MISSILE TOWARDS PAKISTAN - IT WASN’T A MISTAKE




Three days after firing a nuclear capable missile towards Pakistan, India has finally admitted that it was done from their side however, it was not deliberate.  Pakistan has rejected Indian apology and has asked for a joint investigation of this matter. India has rejected Pakistan's demand of a joint investigation of  this matter.





India has asked Pakistan to let it go and move forward as a neighbors. In other words, let us push the garbage under the carpet. As per media reports it was India’s BrahMos missile which India used to produce with Russian cooperation. Now, the main question under consideration here is that was it really an accident?  Following factors suggests otherwise:

SELF DESTRUCTION MODE

Such types of missiles are always equipped with self-destruction mechanism to counter the situations where they are fired by mistake so why India did not destroyed it before it entered in Pakistani airspace.



LOCATION

These types of supersonic missiles always follow the route that is pre assigned to them before they are fired. So even if it was an accident, how missile went towards Pakistan and that also towards the direction where Pakistan’s important strategic military base was located?

MYSTERIOUS SILENCE                    

If it was fired by mistake, why India did not informed Pakistan immediately? The incident happened on the evening of 9th March 2022 but India admitted it on third day of the incident. India might have never admitted this blunder but because Pakistan brought this issue to global attention that is why India had to issue official statement about it following the press conference of Pakistani military’s spokesperson.

MULTIPLE LAYERS

Launching a missile is not like firing a pistol or a gun. It is not like someone presses button and missile will go off that also, a nuclear capable missile. There used to be multiple layers of commands involved in this process. How is it even possible that all these commands were exercised accidently or by mistake?



CONSEQUENCES

This missile stayed in Pakistani airspace for over 3 minutes and Pakistan was monitoring its flight continuously from the moment it took off around 100 kilometers inside Indian main land. What if Pakistan had also launched a missile in retaliation? It would have started a war between two nuclear-armed neighbors. Who would have been responsible for that?

 

WORLD MUST PAY ATTENTION

If Indian nuclear capable missiles are hitting the wrong targets “by mistake” than who will be responsible if India launches a missile towards Pakistan or  China during war time and it strikes Indian cities  instead of  hitting its target in Pakistan and China? Will India blame China and Pakistan for that?



https://reticencevaliddecoction.com/y8481e0z?key=0ee2be2f5e34a58eed18b0b3d54c7ea7



If nuclear capable Indian missiles are being launched by mistake, how India has been allowed to carry nukes with such a faulty delivery system?

India must come up with reasonable explanation of this historic blunder/ mischief rather than hoping that a simple apology will solve the matter. 

(The Blank Page Official)

Reach us at: 

Website: https://theblankpageofficial.blogspot.com/

Youtube:  https://www.youtube.com/TheBlankPageOfficial

Twitter:    https://twitter.com/PageBlank

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TBPOfficial1/


Support us: 

Patreon :  https://www.patreon.com/theblankpageofficial




https://reticencevaliddecoction.com/y8481e0z?key=0ee2be2f5e34a58eed18b0b3d54c7ea7



 

 



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Iranian FM, Hezbollah Leader Discuss Regional Developments

TEHRAN (Tasnim) – Secretary General of the Lebanese Hezbollah resistance movement Seyed Hassan Nasrallah and Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amirabdollahian met in Beirut on Thursday for talks on the latest regional developments.  The top Iranian diplomat and the Hezbollah chief exchanged views on regional issues, with a particular focus on Palestine and Lebanon, according to Iran's Ambassador to Beirut, Mojtaba Amani. Amani stated that Amirabdollahian and Nasrallah also discussed potential future events in the region, efforts to halt Israel's atrocities against Gaza, possible scenarios regarding the ongoing war, and the global collective responsibility concerning "the historic and determining development." On Wednesday, Amirabdollahian engaged in talks with Ziad al-Nakhala, Secretary General of the Gaza-based Islamic Jihad movement, Khalil al-Hayya, deputy chief of the political bureau of the Palestinian resistance movement Hamas in Gaza, and other o...

WHY AMERICA WANTS BANGLADESH IN QUAD? WHAT IS THE GEOGRAPHICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF BANGLADESH?

  Amercia has been pressurising Bangladesh since long now to join US led anti china alliance that is called as QUAD anf which include America, Japan, Australia and Bangladesh's neighbor  India. Question under discussion here is that What is the geographical  significance  of Bangladesh and What it can offer to  the QUAD allaince if it is included in this group?  Follow us on The Blank Page Official on Facebook:   https://www.facebook.com/TBPOfficial1/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/pageblank Website: https://theblankpageofficial.blogspot.com/ Support us:  Patreon :   https://www.patreon.com/theblankpageofficial https://reticencevaliddecoction.com/y8481e0z?key=0ee2be2f5e34a58eed18b0b3d54c7ea7

Poll: US Public Support for Israel Wanes as 68 Percent Call for Ceasefire

  TEHRAN (FNA)- Israel’s war on Gaza is upsetting many Americans who think it must follow growing demands for an immediate ceasefire, according to a new poll. The Reuters/Ipsos survey found only 32 percent of respondents said “the US should support Israel”. That is down from 41 percent from a poll conducted on October 12-13 – just days after the war broke out. About 68 percent of respondents said they agreed with the statement, “Israel should call a ceasefire and try to negotiate”. Some 39 percent supported the idea “the US should be a neutral mediator”, compared with 27 percent a month earlier. Only 4 percent of respondents said the United States should support Palestinians, while 15 percent said the US shouldn’t be involved at all in the war. While the US has been a significant Israeli ally, just 31 percent of respondents said they supported sending Israel weapons. The plunge in support...